|
Dear Jonathan
Re: "Customer service"
I think you have chosen poor examples. Maybe a reason why no-one answered the phone is that, in common with many pharmacies, profits have been reduced so much by the Department of Health that staff levels have been reduced. It is really quite simple - staff are paid from the gross profit that the pharmacy makes, so less profit translates into less staff.
Secondly, slow moving or hard to get hold of medicines are less likely to be stocked when the risk of loss (out-of-date, spoilage etc) is not underwritten by sufficient profits to provide this necessary service to patients.
Thirdly, the quotas on purchasing branded medicines imposed by big pharmaceutical companies in order to keep their prices and profits high result in a lot of time being spent on sourcing regular products leaving less time for anything else.
I may have generalised but the principles are sound. Customer service is a resource that costs money just like electricity. If profits are down you economise where you can. If you want investment in staff, training, stock levels or anything else you must make provide the profit.
Regards,
Charles Caller
Jonathan responds I disagree with the assertion that customer service costs money - good customer service costs nothing and is not dependant on staffing levels. Being rude to customers is unprofessional - the Code of Ethics is clear on this point, in the course of our professional practice, pharmacists must treat others politely and considerately.
I appreciate the difficulties that pharmacists are facing with regard to stock, but there is no excuse for rudeness. Poor customer service can lose business, and if times are so hard then can you really afford to lose customers through downright rudeness?
|